A64002:2424
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
First, All the Logic in the World, though racked never so much, cannot infer out of the Text, that Christ prayed universally for the pardon of all his Crucifiers: for out of an indefinite term, a universal cannot be concluded, saith our Author, in defence of Moulin his denial that Christ prayed for all without exception. Vindic. l. 1. part. 2. Digres. 7. p. 136.
First, All the Logick in the World, though racked never so much, cannot inferre out of the Text, that Christ prayed universally for the pardon of all his Crucifyers: for out of an indefinite terme, a universall cannot be concluded, saith our Author, in defence of Moulin his denyall that Christ prayed for all without exception. Vindic. l. 1. part. 2. Digres. 7. p. 136.
Secondly, That Christ prayed not for all his Crucifiers without exception, may be cleared from the Text, both considered in it self, and compared with other places of Scripture, as also by reason.
Secondly, That Christ prayed not for all his Crucifiers without exception, may be cleared from the Text, both considered in it selfe, and compared with other places of Scripture, as also by reason.
First, From the Text considered in it self; Father forgive them, for they know not what they do: Here Moulin, from the reason adjoined to the Petition, concludes, That he prayed not for all that had a hand in Crucifying him, but only for those who did it out of ignorance; and in all probability some of them, especially some of the rulers, did it out of pure malice. And whereas Corvinus objecteth out of Acts 3. 17. against Moulin; That even the Rulers did it through ignorance: Doctor Twice upbraideth him with his unskilfulness in framing consequences, and making an indefinite proposition equivalent unto an universal. It doth not follow, (saith he) The Rulers did this through ignorance, therefore all the Rulers did it through ignorance. That some did, is certain from that place; and so it is,