A64002:688
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The same Capreolus proceeds to show out of Aquinas in 1 Sent. Dist. 8. q. 1. art. 1. ad 4. How we must make progress in our knowledge of God, by way of remotion or negation.
The same Capreolus proceeds to shew out of Aquinas in 1 Sent. Dist. 8. q. 1. art. 1. ad 4. How we must make progresse in our knowledge of God, by way of remotion or negation.
Quando, inquit, in divinis procedimus per viam remotionis, primò negamus corporalia, & Secundò intellectualia, secundum quod inveniuntur in creaturis, ut bonitas & sapientia, & tunc remanet in intellectu Quod est, & nihil amplius, unde est, sicut in quadam confusione. When (saith he) we proceed by way of remotion, or negation, in searching out the Divine nature, first we deny of him all corporal things, and secondly we deny of him all intellectual things, after such a sort as they are found in the creatures, as goodness and wisdom, (mark this well for these and such like are the virtues which this Author saith are of the same nature in God and man differing only in degree) and then there remains in the understanding, id quod est (as much as to say [Greek or Hebrew] Ens) and nothing more; and hence the understanding remains as in a certain confusion.
Quando, inquit, in divinis procedimus per viam remotionis, primò negamus corporalia, & Secundò intellectualia, secundum quod inveniuntur in creaturis, ut bonitas & sapientia, & tunc remanet in intellectu Quod est, & nihil amplius, unde est, sicut in quadam confusione. When (saith he) we proceed by way of remotion, or negation, in searching out the Divine nature, first we deny of him all corporall things, and secondly we deny of him all intellectuall things, after such a sort as they are found in the creatures, as godnesse and wisdome, (mark this well for these and such like are the vertues which this Author saith are of the same nature in God and man differing only in degree) and then there remains in the understanding, id quod est (as much as to say 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 Ens) and nothing more; and hence the understanding remains as in a certain confusion.