A64002:868
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
TWICE Consideration.
TWISSE Consideration.
This Second answer is in like manner, delivered at pleasure, without quoting the Author of it: And no marvel if this Author desires to have the making of his own bed, that he may lye the more softly. Yet touching the similitude here mentioned let it be stated aright: a Master trusts his servant with a stock, not to receive it from him again, though the stock be of a moveable nature, but to receive from him in lieu thereof, some yearly emolument. In this case let him say what he can against it: now here his discourse is for the most part at large, showing how God, though a most free agent, may oblige himself to his creature.
THis Second answer is in like manner, delivered at pleasure, without quoting the Author of it: And no marvaile if this Author desires to have the making of his own bed, that he may lye the more softly. Yet touching the similitude here mentioned let it be stated aright: a Master trusts his servant with a stock, not to receive it from him againe, though the stock be of a moveable nature, but to receive from him in lieu thereof, some yearely emolument. In this case let him say what he can against it: now here his discourse is for the most part at large, shewing how God, though a most free agent, may oblige himselfe to his creature.