A64003:288
A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certain doubts concerning predestination together with an examination…A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certaine doubts concerning predestination together with an examination…
A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certain doubts concerning predestination together with an examination thereof / written by William Twice ...A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certaine doubts concerning predestination together with an examination thereof / written by William Twisse ...
London: printed by J.D. for Andrew Crook, 1646
AN EXAMINATION of a Treatise written by Master Cotton, for the clea… › QUESTION •.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Come we now to salvation and damnation; you seem to say that God of his free grace doth save a man. In my judgement it is an improvident speech. For, consider, whom doth God save of ripe years? Doth he save any other but those that die in the Lord? That is, such as die in the state of grace, in the state of faith and repentance? Now judge, I pray, Is it fit to say, It is free and indifferent with God, either to save or damn them who die in the Lord, in the state of grace, in the state of repentance? For, hath not God made as well such a law, that, whosoever believes and repents, he shall be saved? As such a law, Whosoever believes not, nor repents, shall be damned? And, in respect of the former law, is not God as much obliged to save them that believe and repent, as in respect of the latter law, he is obliged to damn them that believe not, that repent not? So that the comparison is miserably to blame, made between the freeness of Gods grace in saving the one, and his severity and justice in condemning others: And the confounding of effectual vocation and salvation on the one side, and obduration with damnation on the other, hath exposed you to this incongruity ere you are aware. So that, whereas I thought to have least to do about this use, a greater business is made unto me in clearing the truth of God herein then I could imagine: and yet I am not come to an end. This may suffice to discover the unsoundness of the main body of your comparison. But there are some other things to be considered on the by: First, by way of amplifying the largeness of the riches of the grace of God. You tell us how the Lord carrieth the salvation of his Elect in all the ways of it, &c. And forthwith by way of addition you say, that under them also are spread the everlasting arms of Gods power and eternal love, to guide them to his eternal kingdom: Which is no different thing, but merely the same with the former, of carrying their salvation along in all the ways of it. These expressions, I confess, are momentuous, to stir up gracious affections in the apprehension of the freeness and power of Gods grace. But, if hereby our judgement (in the mean time) is not a little disturbed ⟨p. 140⟩in discerning Gods truth, so that we embrace error in stead thereof, we shall buy good affections at too dear a rate, as is the loss of truth.
Come wee now to salvation and damnation; you seeme to say that God of his free grace doth save a man. In my judgement it is an improvident speech. For, consider, whom doth God save of ripe yeares? Doth hee save any other but those that die in the Lord? That is, such as die in the state of grace, in the state of faith and repentance? Now judge, I pray, Is it fit to say, It is free and indifferent with God, either to save or damne them who die in the Lord, in the state of grace, in the state of repentance? For, hath not God made as well such a law, that, whosoever beleeves and repents, he shall be saved? As such a law, Whosoever beleeves not, nor repents, shall be damned? And, in respect of the former law, is not God as much obliged to save them that beleeve and repent, as in respect of the latter law, hee is obliged to damne them that beleeve not, that repent not? So that the comparison is miserably to blame, made between the freenesse of Gods grace in saving the one, and his severitie and justice in condemning others: And the confounding of effectuall vocation and salvation on the one side, and obduration with damnation on the other, hath exposed you to this incongruitie ere you are aware. So that, whereas I thought to have least to doe about this use, a greater businesse is made unto me in clearing the truth of God herein then I could imagine: and yet I am not come to an end. This may suffice to discover the unsoundnesse of the maine body of your comparison. But there are some other things to be considered on the by: First, by way of amplifying the largenesse of the riches of the grace of God. You tell us how the Lord carrieth the salvation of his Elect in all the wayes of it, &c. And forthwith by way of addition you say, that under them also are spread the everlastig armes of Gods power and eternall love, to guide them to his eternall kingdome: Which is no different thing, but meerely the same with the former, of carrying their salvation along in all the wayes of it. These expressions, I confesse, are momentuous, to stir up gracious affections in the apprehension of the freenesse and power of Gods grace. But, if hereby our judgement (in the meane time) is not a little disturbed