A64003:472
A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certain doubts concerning predestination together with an examination…A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certaine doubts concerning predestination together with an examination…
A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certain doubts concerning predestination together with an examination thereof / written by William Twice ...A treatise of Mr. Cottons clearing certaine doubts concerning predestination together with an examination thereof / written by William Twisse ...
London: printed by J.D. for Andrew Crook, 1646
AN EXAMINATION of a Treatise written by Master Cotton, for the clea… › Question 5: The Fifth Doubt.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The question is only of the sufficiency of man to perform what the means do move us unto.
The question is onely of the sufficiency of man to perform what the means doe move us unto.
I confess under means you comprehend, not only the book of grace, which is Gods word, but the book of Nature also, which is Gods works, the sufficiency whereof to inform either, as touching the nature of God or duty of man, we utterly deny, neither are you able to prove. And therefore you do not so well to carry it in the general, seeing as touching the specials, it is true of the one, not of the other. And in such cases the issue of generals, is rather to circumvent a simple Reader then to inform him.
I confesse under means you comprehend, not only the book of grace, which is Gods word, but the book of Nature also, which is Gods works, the sufficiency whereof to inform either, as touching the nature of God or duty of man, wee utterly deny, neither are you able to prove. And therefore you doe not so well to carry it in the general, seeing as touching the specials, it is true of the one, not of the other. And in such cases the issue of generalls, is rather to circumvent a simple Reader then to inform him.
And yet as touching that undue comparison by you made, and formerly mentioned; you do not carry it so cleanly, but that by the way you supplant your self; as when you speak of the sufficiency of the means, to the ends formerly mentioned, except they be hindered by men. For it cannot be understood of bringing a man passively to those ends, to wit, unto repentance. For man neither is nor can be merely passive in repentance, but must be active also. Nay, for ought I see, you make him passive therein, only in respect of instruction, and exhortation, which nothing hinders, but that he may be altogether active in performing repentance, if he will. Sith then repentance is the end whereto these means tend, and the means are sufficient to bring any to repentance (as you avouch) except they be hindered by men, it must necessarily follow, that man hath power by these means to attain to these ends whereto these means lead him, if he will; and consequently hath power to repent, and to obtain grace in Christ, if he will; for the means lead hereunto, namely, to the knowledge of God and grace in Christ, as your self have professed in express terms.