A64635:152
Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome…
Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome (with a sermon of Bishop Beadles upon the same words) of laying on of hands (Heb. 6. 2.) to be an ordained ministry, of the old form of words in ordination, of a set form of prayer : each being the judgment of the late Arch-bishop of Armagh, and Primate of Ireland / published and enlarged by Nicholas Bernard ... : unto which is added a character of Bishop Bedel, and an answer to Mr. Pierces fifth letter concerning the late Primate.Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome (with a sermon of Bishop Bedels upon the same words) of laying on of hands (Heb. 6. 2.) to be an ordained ministry, of the old form of words in ordination, of a set form of prayer : each being the judgment of the late Arch-bishop of Armagh, and Primate of Ireland / published and enlarged by Nicholas Bernard ... : unto which is added a character of Bishop Bedel, and an answer to Mr. Pierces fifth letter concerning the late Primate.
London: printed for John Crook, 1659
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Bishop Prideaux, in his Lectures saith the like often, specially in that de Antichristo, that he cannot be the Turk, but the Pope, &c, Unto which Bishops might be added, the votes of many other learned orthodox and Episcopal men, whose judgements have been declared accordingly: As that learned Professor of Divinity, Doctor Samuel Ward, in his Lectures and Determinations at Cambridge, lately printed: specially in those three questions, Romana Ecclesia est Idololatrica; Apostasia à Paulo praedicta, est adimpleta; Romana Ecclesia est schismatica, i. e. 1. The Roman Church is Idolatrous. 2. The Apostasy foretold by Saint Paul, is fulfilled. 3. The Roman Church is schismatical. Thus concluding in relation to the See ⟨p. 136⟩of Rome. Haec scilicet est illa Babylon, quae in corde suo dicit sedeo regina, sola sum, & non est praeter me. i. e. This is that Babylon which saith in her heart, I sit as a Queen, I am only, & there is none besides me. And who knows not (till of later years) how both the Universities in their public disputations, and determinations, abounded in their conclusions accordingly.
Bishop Prideaux, in his Lectures saith the like often, specially in that de Antichristo, that he cannot be the Turk, but the Pope, &c, Unto which Bishops might be added, the votes of many other learned orthodox and Episcopall men, whose judgements have been declared accordingly: As that learned Professor of Divinity, Doctor Samuel Ward, in his Lectures and Determinations at Cambridge, lately printed: specially in those three questions, Romana Ecclesia est Idololatrica; Apostasia à Paulo praedicta, est adimpleta; Romana Ecclesia est schismatica, i. e. 1. The Roman Church is Idolatrous. 2. The Apostasie foretold by Saint Paul, is fulfilled. 3. The Roman Church is schismaticall. Thus concluding in relation to the See ⟨p. 136⟩of Rome. Haec scilicet est illa Babylon, quae in corde suo dicit sedeo regina, sola sum, & non est praeter me. i. e. This is that Babylon which saith in her heart, I sit as a Queen, I am only, & there is none besides me. And who knowes not (till of later yeares) how both the Vniversities in their publick disputations, and determinations, abounded in their conclusions accordingly.