A64635:17
Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome…
Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome (with a sermon of Bishop Beadles upon the same words) of laying on of hands (Heb. 6. 2.) to be an ordained ministry, of the old form of words in ordination, of a set form of prayer : each being the judgment of the late Arch-bishop of Armagh, and Primate of Ireland / published and enlarged by Nicholas Bernard ... : unto which is added a character of Bishop Bedel, and an answer to Mr. Pierces fifth letter concerning the late Primate.Certain discourses, viz. of Babylon (Rev. 18. 4.) being the present See of Rome (with a sermon of Bishop Bedels upon the same words) of laying on of hands (Heb. 6. 2.) to be an ordained ministry, of the old form of words in ordination, of a set form of prayer : each being the judgment of the late Arch-bishop of Armagh, and Primate of Ireland / published and enlarged by Nicholas Bernard ... : unto which is added a character of Bishop Bedel, and an answer to Mr. Pierces fifth letter concerning the late Primate.
London: printed for John Crook, 1659
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The first Treatise, being the Primates three positions concerning ⟨image 5⟩Babylon, was wrote above 40 years ago, (which appears by the places of Scripture, rendered according to the old Translation) and sent to an Irish Jesuit in Dublin, (as I take itc Christophorus à sacro bosco, there called F. Halywood, the sum of which having been delivered by the Primate in a Sermon which he preached at Greys-Inn, Nov. 5. 1654. and being much desired by some of the Auditors to be published, he did condescend, to permit this, with that other Letter following, in their satisfaction.
The first Treatise, being the Primates three positions concerning ⟨image 5⟩Babylon, was wrot above 40 years agone, (which appears by the places of Scripture, rendred according to the old Translation) and sent to an Irish Jesuit in Dublin, (as I take itc Christophorus à sacro bosco, there called F. Halywood, the summe of which having been delivered by the Primate in a Sermon which he preached at Grays-Inne, Nov. 5. 1654. and being much desired by some of the Auditours to be published, he did condescend, to permit this, with that other Letter following, in their satisfaction.
- cThe first that broached that figment of the Nags head conscration in England, after 45 years silence of any other Author, which in Bishop Beadles Letters to Wadesworth, p. 142. is confuted.The first that broached that figment of the Nagges head conscration in England, after 45 yeares silence of any other Author, which in Bishop Bedells Letters to Wadesworth, p. 142. is confuted.
The learned Sermon of Bishop Beadles (being of the same subject) I heard him preach it in Christ-Church, Dublin, 1634. before the Lord Deputy and Parliament. The occasion of his giving a copy of it, was at the request of a Papist, to