A68877:269
Gods husbandry
Gods husbandry: the first part. Tending to show the difference betwixt the hypocrite and the true-hearted Christian. As it was delivered in certain sermons, and is now published by William Whately, preacher of the Word of God in Banbury in OxfordshireGods husbandry: the first part. Tending to shew the difference betwixt the hypocrite and the true-hearted Christian. As it was deliuered in certaine sermons, and is now published by William Whately, preacher of the Word of God in Banbury in Oxfordsheire
London: printed by Bernard Alsop and Felix Kyngston for Thomas Man, 1622
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now this truth, in the first place, Use 1 is strong enough to overthrow two grand errors at once.1 The first is of the Papists, of the merit of works. No obedience can possibly merit in any kind of meriting, but that which is complete, absolute, and perfect. For the life promised by the Law, cannot be challenged by virtue of the Law, unless the condition, whereupon the Law doth promise it, be wholly, and in every part and particle fulfilled: seeing if one man make a covenant with another of giving him such a reward, upon condition that he do go to such a place, and dispatch (for example) four several businesses: the man with whom this bargain is made, cannot, by virtue of the bargain, challenge from the bargain-maker, the reward specified, if he go to the place and dispatch but half the businesses, or all, or any of them but by the halves: for a conditional promise, in reason and equity, bindeth not the promise-maker, but upon the perfect fulfilling of the work for which ⟨p. 74⟩the promise was made. Now the Law, the covenant by which we must challenge life, if we will stand upon any kind of merit, saith, Do this, and live, and that we may know its meaning to be, do it fully, perfectly, exactly, without any failing; it explicates it self, saying, Cursed be the man that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them. Wherefore by virtue of the Law, upon the worth and desert of the works thereof, no man can lay claim to life, unless he can say, I have done this, I have confirmed the whole Law to do it. Now whosoever hath sins and corruptions, and disorders in him, whosoever offendeth in many things, whosoever doth the evil he would not, cannot say that he establisheth the whole Law by doing it: and our point hath made it plain, that the best of all Gods Saints the Apostles, Paul, James, John, Peter not excepted, (and I hope, none will be bold to think himself better then these pillars) must be fain to confess that they transgress in many things, and must not dare to say that they have no sin in this life; wherefore it follows inevitably, plainly, clearly, incontrollably, to any reasonable mans understanding, that they can in no sort lay claim to heaven, by any manner of worth, or deserving of their works.
NOw this truth, in the first place, Vse 1 is strong enough to ouerthrow two grand errours at once.1