A69535:297
The grand debate between the most reverend bishops and the Presbyterian divines appointed by…
The grand debate between the most reverend bishops and the Presbyterian divines appointed by His Sacred Majesty as commissioners for the review and alteration of the Book of common prayer, &c. : being an exact account of their whole proceedings : the most perfect copy.
London printed : s.n., 1661
THE PAPERS That passed between the COMMISSIONERS Appointed by His M… › Section
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
[The third and fourth Proposals may go together, the demand in 1both being against Responsals, and alternate Readings, in Hymns and Psalms, and Litany, &c. And that upon such Reason as doth in truth enforce the necessity of continuing them as they are, namely, for edification. They would take these away, because they do not edify, and upon that very reason they should continue, because they do edify: If not by informing of our reasons and understandings, (the Prayers and Hymns were never made for a Catechism) yet by quickening, continuing, and uniting our devotion, which is apt to freeze, or sleep, or flat in a long continued Prayer, or form; it is necessary therefore for the edifying of us therein, to be often called upon and awakened by frequent Amens, to be excited and stirred up by mutual exultations, provocations, petitions, holy contentions and strivings, which shall most show his own, and stir up others zeal to the glory of God. For this purpose alternate Reading, Repetitions and Responsals, are far better than a long tedious Prayer: Nor is this our opinion only, but the 2Judgement of former Ages, as appears by the practice of ancient Christian Churches, and of the Jews also. But it seems they say to be against the Scripture, wherein the Minister is appointed for the People in public Prayers, the peoples part being to attend with silence, and to declare their assent in the close, by saying Amen; if they mean that the people in public Services must only say this word Amen, as they can no more prove it in Scriptures, so it doth certainly seem to them, that it cannot be proved; for they directly practise the contrary in one of their principal parts of Worship, singing of Psalms, where the people bear as great a part as the Minister. If this way be done in Hopkin's, why not in David's Psalms? if in Metre, why not in Prose? if in a Psalm, why not in a Litany?]
[The third and fourth Proposals may go together, the demand in