A70969:14
The reasons presented by the Dissenting Brethren against certain propositions concerning presbyterial government and…The reasons presented by the Dissenting Brethren against certain propositions concerning presbyteriall government and…
The reasons presented by the Dissenting Brethren against certain propositions concerning presbyterial government and the proofs of them voted by the Assembly of Divines, sitting by authority of Parliament, at Westminster : together with the Answer of the Assembly of Divines to those reasons of dissent.The reasons presented by the Dissenting Brethren against certain propositions concerning presbyteriall government and the proofs of them voted by the Assembly of Divines, sitting by authority of Parliament, at Westminster : together with the Answer of the Assembly of Divines to those reasons of dissent.
London: printed by T.R. and E.M. for Humphrey Harward, 1648
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
When these Propositions that follow, were brought in by the sub-Committee, as containing both a fuller explication, and the best way to accommodate their own and their brethren's principles in a practic way (which was the end of that honourable Committee) both for Congregations, and Synods, and the government thereof.
When these Propositions that follow, were brought in by the sub-Committee, as containing both a fuller explication, and the best way to accommodate their own and their brethrens principles in a practique way (which was the end of that honourable Committee) both for Congregations, and Synods, and the government thereof.
October 15. 1644. The honourable Committee of Lords, Commons, Divines of the Assembly, with the Scotch-Commissioners met. And these Propositions were read by Master Vines who was the Chair-man of that sub-Committee.
October 15. 1644. The honourable Committee of Lords, Commons, Divines of the Assembly, with the Scotch-Commissioners met. And these Propositions were read by Master Vines who was the Chaire-man of that sub-Committee.
A Vote was past in the Committee to take them into consideration. But that debate was not entered upon, because it was the earnest desire of some that the Rule should first be made complete by the Assembly and the Houses.
A Vote was past in the Committee to take them into consideration. But that debate was not entred upon, because it was the earnest desire of some that the Rule should first be made compleate by the Assembly and the Houses.