A77832:294
A vindication of the book called, Some Gospel-truths opened; according to the Scriptures, and…
A vindication of the book called, Some Gospel-truths opened; according to the Scriptures, and the opposition made against it by Edward Borough, a professed Quaker, (but proved an enemy to the truth) examined and confuted by the word of God. And also, the things that were then laid down, and declared to the world by me, are a second-time born witness to, according to truth: with the answer of Edward Borough to the queries then laid down in my book reproved. And also, a plain answer to his queries, given in simplicity of soul; and is now also presented to the world, or who else may read, or hear them; to the end (if God will) that truth may be discovered thereby. / by John Bunyan ...A vindication of the book called, Some Gospel-truths opened; according to the Scriptures, and the opposition made against it by Edward Borrough, a professed Quaker, (but proved an enemie to the truth) examined and confuted by the word of God. And also, the things that were then laid down, and declared to the world by me, are a second-time born witness to, according to truth: with the answer of Edward Burrough to the quæries then laid down in my book reproved. And also, a plain answer to his quæries, given in simplicitie of soul; and is now also presented to the world, or who else may read, or hear them; to the end (if God will) that truth may be discovered thereby. / by John Bunyan ...
London: printed by Matthias Cowley, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The second charge is against my self, and is this; John Bunyan said, Christ second coming is not his coming in Spirit, for his coming in Spirit is no coming.1
The second charge is •gainst my self, and is this; John Bunyan said, Christ second coming is not his coming in Spirit, for his coming in Spirit is no coming.1
- 1This is a false thing spoken of me.
The former part of the words; namely, Christs second coming is not his coming in Spirit, those I own. But the other, namely, * For his coming in spirit is no coming, is a lie, made of me by the Author, Edward Borough.
The former part of the words; namely, Christs second coming is not his coming in Spirit, those I owne. But the other, namely, * For his coming in spirit is no coming, is a lie, made of me by the Author, Edward Borrough.
The former words were spoken at a meeting in Bedford, some Quakers ⟨p. 48⟩being present contradicting and blaspheming: And now they could not be content with that; but they must make up all with a lie, and publish it in print. Quaker there and I had some discourse concerning Christ's second coming, and he would affirm, that his coming in Spirit was his second coming, spoken of in Scripture. Then I asked him, which was his first coming? He answered, when he was born of rhe Virgin, and took flesh upon him from her. Then said I, I shall easily prove, that his coming in the Spirit is not his second coming, for I will prove that his coming in the Spirit was before that which the Scripture and you also do call his first coming; and proved it by that plain Scripture, where Peter speaking of the Prophets, saith, searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them (the Prophets) did signify, when it testified before hand of the suffering of Christ, and the glory that should follow,