A78005:40
A vindication of Mr Burroughs, against Mr Edwards his foul aspersions, in his spreading…A vindication of Mr Burroughes, against Mr Edwards his foule aspersions, in his spreading…
A vindication of Mr Burroughs, against Mr Edwards his foul aspersions, in his spreading Gangræna, and his angry Antiapologia. Concluding with a brief declaration what the Independents would have. / By Jer: Burroughs.A vindication of Mr Burroughes, against Mr Edwards his foule aspersions, in his spreading Gangræna, and his angry Antiapologia. Concluding with a briefe declaration what the Independents would have. / By Jer: Burroughes.
London: printed for H. Overton, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
After all this that is said, were it much more to this or any thing else, it is easy for him to cry out in M. Bellamies shop, and afterwards in his Book, It is a lye, it is a lye, nothing but juggling, nothing but Jesuitical equivocation. Oh what strange men are these! But you know the man, and the manner of his communication.
After all this that is said, were it much more to this or any thing else, it is easie for him to cry out in M. Bellamies shop, and afterwards in his Booke, It is a lye, it is a lye, nothing but jugling, nothing but Iesuiticall equivocation. Oh what strange men are these! But you know the man, and the manner of his communication.
Page 94. of the second part of his Gangraena, he enquires what the reasons might be that M. Burroughs and M. Greenhil should conspire together to give such a testimony in writing. But whence doth it appear that M. Greenhill gave this testimony in writing? his hand is not to it. How doth it appear that he conspired it should be given in writing? may not I relate what he said, and yet he not conspire to give it in writing? That writing I take wholly upon my self. He gives three reasons why he thinks we did it: The first two are from his being conscientious of evil in himself and Book: His third is, that they might free themselves from suspicion of being against a toleration of other sects and opinions.
Page 94. of the second part of his Gangraena, he enquires what the reasons might be that M. Burroughes and M. Greenhil should conspire together to give such a testimony in writing. But whence doth it appeare that M. Greenhill gave this testimony in writing? his hand is not to it. How doth it appeare that hee conspired it should be given in writing? may not I relate what he said, and yet he not conspire to give it in writing? That writing I take wholly upon my selfe. He gives three reasons why he thinks we did it: The first two are from his being conscientious of evill in himselfe and Booke: His third is, that they might free themselves from suspition of being against a toleration of other sects and opinions.