A80608:1366
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Then the Examiner should not have said, that the Model raised up Moses out of his grave, but that it raised up Christ out of his grave.
Then the Examiner should not have said, that the Modell raised up Moses out of his grave, but that it raised up Christ out of his grave.
If it be said again, the Examiner saith, It denied Christ to have seen the earth, which was of as ill consequence. Be it so: but yet still, this maketh nothing to the raising up of Moses out of his grave.
If it be said againe, the Examiner saith, It denyed Christ to have seen the earth, which was of as ill consequence. Be it so: but yet still, this maketh nothing to the rasing up of Moses out of his grave.
I Answer further, Neither doth it at all deny, Christ to have seen the earth. For Christ came not to destroy the Law of Moses, Mat. 5.17. Neither the Moral Law: for in the sequel of that Chapter, he doth at large expound it, and establish it:
I Answer further, Neither doth it at all deny, Christ to have seen the earth. For Christ came not to destroy the Law of Moses, Mat. 5.17. Neither the Morall Law: for in the sequele of that Chapter, he doth at large expound it, and establish it: