A80608:1392
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Soon after, when upon hearing of some Episcopal, and malignant practises against the Country, the Magistrates, and whole general Court thought meet to take a trial of the fidelity of the people (not by imposing upon them, but) by offering to them an Oath of Fidelity, That in case any should refuse, they might not betrust them with place of public Command; He vehemently withstood it, partly because it was Christs Prerogative to have his Office established by Oath; partly, because an Oath was a part of Gods worship, and many of the people being carnal (as he conceived) it was not meet to put upon them an Oath, which was an act of Gods worship. Upon such, and the like disturbances to the Civill Peace (for upon this sundry refused the Oath, and upon their refusal the Magistrates could not discern how the people stood affected to the public Safety) therefore, both the Magistrates, and sundry Elders (though I do not remember my self to be one) advised the Church of Salem, not to proceed to choose him (as they were then about to do) unto office in the Church. Yea and in Salem (though many of the Members were taken with him) some judicious amongst them told me, they could not choose him to office, because they found him to be (contrary to the Apostles rule) [Greek or Hebrew], self-pleasing, self-full, or (as it is translated) self-willed, Tit. 1.7. Nevertheless, the major part of the Church made choice of him. Soon after the Church of Salem made suit to the Court, for a parcel of Land, which lay commodious for them: But the Court delayed to grant their request, because the Church had refused to hearken to their motion, in forbearing the choice of Mr. Williams. Which so much incensed Mr. Williams, that he caused ⟨p. 5⟩the Church to join with him, in writing Letters of Admonition to all the Churches, whereof any of the Magistrates were members, to admonish their Magistrates of their breach of the rule of Justice, in not granting their Petition. Which following upon all the former disturbances raised by Mr. Williams, it still aggravated the former jealousies, which generally, the judicious sort of Christians had conceived of his self-conceited, and unquiet, and unlambelike frame of his Spirit:
Soone after, when upon hearing of some Episcopall, and malignant practises against the Countrey, the Magistrates, and whole generall Court thought meet to take a tryall of the fidelity of the people (not by imposing upon them, but) by offering to them an Oath of Fidelitie, That in case any should refuse, they might not betrust them with place of publick Command; He vehemently withstood it, partly because it was Christs Prerogative to have his Office established by Oath; partly, because an Oath was a part of Gods worship, and many of the people being carnall (as he conceived) it was not meet to put upon them an Oath, which was an act of Gods worship. Upon such, and the like disturbances to the Civill Peace (for upon this sundry refused the Oath, and upon their refusall the Magistrates could not discerne how the people stood affected to the publick Safety) therefore, both the Magistrates, and sundry Elders (though I doe not remember my selfe to be one) advised the Church of Salem, not to proceed to choose him (as they were then about to doe) unto office in the Church. Yea and in Salem (though many of the Members were taken with him) some judicious amongst them told me, they could not choose him to office, because they found him to be (contrary to the Apostles rule) , selfe-pleasing, selfe-full, or (as it is translated) selfe-willed,