A80608:145
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
CHAP. 12. A Reply to his twelveth Chapter Entering upon the Discussion of the unlawfulness to Persecute an Erroneous and blind Conscience.
CHAP. 12. A Reply to his twelueth Chapter Entring upon the Discussion of the unlawfulnes to Persecute an Erroneous and blinde Conscience.
Discusser.
The second Conclusion laid down by the Answerer, is: It is not lawful to persecute an Erroneous and blind Conscience, Even in Fundamental, and weighty Points, till after Admonition once, or twice Tit. 3.10, 11. And then such Consciences may be persecuted; because the Word of God is so clear, in Fundamental and weighty Points, that such a person cannot but sin against his Conscience, and so being condemned of himself, that is of his Conscience, he may be persecuted for sinning against his own Conscience.
The second Conclusion lay'd downe by the Answerer, is: It is not lawfull to persecute an Erroneous and blinde Conscience, Even in Fundamentall, and weighty Points, till after Admonition once, or twice Tit. 3.10, 11. And then such Consciences may be persecuted; because the Word of God is so cleare, in Fundamentall and weighty Points, that such a person cannot but sinne against his Conscience, and so being condemned of himselfe, that is of his Conscience, he may be persecuted for sinning against his own Conscience.