A80608:1708
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Reply. 1. His expressions of himself in that Point were so incommodious, as that a plain Reader, (such as my self, unwonted to hear such language, in his sense) could not easily conceive, that he speaking of godly persons, no less unfit for Church-fellowship, then Trees and Quarries unfit for a Building.
Reply. 1. His expressions of himselfe in that Point were so incommodious, as that a plaine Reader, (such as my selfe, unwonted to heare such language, in his sence) could not easily conceive, that he speaking of godly persons, no lesse unfit for Church-fellowship, then Trees and Quarries unfit for a Building.
I say, I could not easily conceive, that by Trees and Quarries should be meant any other persons then unregenerate: and it seemed to me, to imply a contradiction, to call them ungodly, who were unregenerate.
Reply. 2. The Examiner wrongeth himself and me, to say, That I would have made it odious in him, to say that godly persons cannot be so enthralled to Antichrist, as to-separate them from Christ. The odiousness he speaketh of is a contradiction: And it was himself, not I, that forged that contradiction, as hath been showed above.
Reply. 2. The Examiner wrongeth himselfe and me, to say, That I would have made it odious in him, to say that godly persons cannot be so enthralled to Antichrist, as to-separate them from Christ. The odiousnesse he speaketh of is a contradiction: And it was himselfe, not I, that forged that contradiction, as hath been shewed above.