A80608:360
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
It is an evasion as groundless as the former, that Elijahs stirring up of Ahab to kill all the Priests and Prophets of Baal, was figurative.
It is an evasion as groundlesse as the former, that Elijahs stirring up of Ahab to kill all the Preists and Prophets of Baal, was figurative.
For all Figures in the old Testament have their Accomplishment •n the New. Now evident it is, Ahab (an Apostate Idolater) was no Type of Christ: nor was Israel (after their Apostasy) a Type of the true Church of Christ: A Tabernacle it was, but not a Tabernacle ⟨p. 55⟩of Christ: Aholah but not Aholibah. To make this act in Israel a Type of Christs act in Christian State, or Church, is to make darkness a type of light. Ceremonial Laws were generally Typical: not so Moses his Judicials, especially those which had in them moral equity.
For all Figures in the old Testament have their Accomplishment •n the New. Now evident it is, Ahab (an Apostate Idolater) was no Type of Christ: nor was Israel (after their Apostacy) a Type of the true Church of Christ: A Tabernacle it was, but not a Tabernacle ⟨p. 55⟩of Christ: Aholah but not Aholibah. To make this act in Israel a Type of Christs act in Christian State, or Church, is to make darknesse a type of light. Ceremoniall Lawes were generally Typicall: not so Moses his Judicialls, especially those which had in them morall equity.
It is Moral equity, That Blasphemers, and Apostate Idolaters, seducing others to Idolatry, should be put to death,