A80608:83
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Distinction now in Discussion concerneth not Truth and Error, but the manner of holding forth, or divulging.
Defender.
The distinction doth expressly speak of holding forth things Erroneous and unlawful, either in a meek and peaceable way, or with such Arrogance and Impetuousness, as tendeth and reacheth (even of it self) to the disturbance of Civill Peace. And therefore it cannot be said with truth, that the distinction concerneth not Truth and Error; The distinction expressly concerneth both the sinful matter held forth [things erroneous and unlawful] and the sinful manner of holding them forth, with such Arrogance and impetuousness, as tendeth to the disturbance of Civill Peace.
The distinction doth expresly speake of holding forth things Erroneous and unlawfull, either in a meeke and peaceable way, or with such Arrogance and Impetuousnesse, as tendeth and reacheth (even of it selfe) to the disturbance of Civill Peace. And therefore it cannot be said with truth, that the distinction concerneth not Truth and Error; The distinction expresly concerneth both the sinfull matter held forth [things erroneous and unlawfull] and the sinfull manner of holding them forth, with such Arrogance and impetuousnesse, as tendeth to the disturbance of Civill Peace.