A80640:643
The way of Congregational churches cleared in two treatises. In the former, from the…
The way of Congregational churches cleared in two treatises. In the former, from the historical aspersions of Mr. Robert Baylie, in his book, called, A dissuasive from the errors of the time. In the latter, from some contradictions of Vindicæ Clavium : and from, some mis-constructions of learned Mr. Rutherford in his book entitled The due right of presbyteries. / By Mr. John Cotton, sometime preacher at Boston in Lincoln-shire, and now teacher of the Church at Boston, in New-England.The way of Congregational churches cleared in two treatises. In the former, from the historical aspersions of Mr. Robert Baylie, in his book, called, A disswasive from the errors of the time. In the latter, from some contradictions of Vindicæ Clavium : and from, some mis-constructions of learned Mr. Rutherford in his book intituled The due right of presbyteries. / By Mr. John Cotton, sometime preacher at Boston in Lincoln-shire, and now teacher of the Church at Boston, in New-England.
London: printed by Matthew Simmons for John Bellamie, 1648
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To this place it belongeth (I mean to the clearing of this Text, Mat. 16.) to consider of the reasons whereby M. Rutterford goeth about to prove, That Christ spake to Peter, as to one representing the Apostles, and not as to one representing all Believers.
To this place it belongeth (I mean to the cleering of this Text, Mat. 16.) to consider of the reasons whereby M. Rutterford goeth about to prove, That Christ spake to Peter, as to one ropresenting the Apostles, and not as to one representing all Believers.
I suppose he understandeth Apostles in a large sense, for all messengers sent of Christ for the ministry of the Gospel in the Church. Otherwise, if he should mean, Christ spake to Peter, as to one representing ⟨p. 43⟩the Apostles properly so called (the 12. Apostles) then the Elders of Churches could claim no interest in the power of the Keys from Christs words to Peter.
I suppose he understandeth Apostles in a large sense, for all messeng•rs sent of Christ for the ministry of the Gospel in the Church. Otherwise, if he should mean, Christ spake to Peter, as to one representing ⟨p. 43⟩the Apostles properly so called (the 12. Apostles) then the Elders of Churches could claim no interest in the power of the Keys from Christs words to Peter.