A81199:948
An exposition with practical observations continued upon the twenty-second, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth, and twenty-sixth…An exposition with practicall observations continued upon the twenty-second, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth, and twenty-sixth…
An exposition with practical observations continued upon the twenty-second, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth, and twenty-sixth chapters of the book of Job being the sum of thirty-seven lectures, delivered at Magnus near London Bridge. By Joseph Caryl, preacher of the Word, and pastor of the congregation there.An exposition with practicall observations continued upon the twenty-second, twenty-third, twenty-fourth, twenty-fifth, and twenty-sixth chapters of the book of Job being the summe of thirty-seven lectures, delivered at Magnus near London Bridge. By Joseph Caryl, preacher of the Word, and pastour of the congregation there.
London: printed by M. Simmons, 1655
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
IN the former Chapter we had the third & last charge of Eliphaz against Job, in this and that which followeth Job makes his reply, and defends himself against what Eliphaz had objected and charged upon him. There are two opinions concerning the tendency of this reply.
IN the former Chapter we had the third & last charge of Eliphaz against Job, in this and that which followeth Job makes his reply, and defends himselfe against what Eliphaz had objected and charged upon him. There are two opinions concerning the tendency of this reply.
First, Some interpret it in favour of Job, as if he only summoned his friends to the tribunal of God, being confident of a good issue there.
First, Some interpret it in favour of Job, as if he onely summoned his friends to the tribunall of God, being confident of a good issue there.
Secondly, Others interpret it as a presumptuous suggestion against God himself, and the strictness of his proceedings with him, which they endeavour to prove upon (as they conceive) these four grounds of his complaint.
Secondly, Others enterpret it as a presumptuous suggestion against God himselfe, and the strictnesse of his proceedings with him, which they endeavour to prove upon (as they conceive) these foure grounds of his complaint.