A81239:41
Deliverance-obstruction
Deliverance-obstruction: or, The set-backs of reformation. Discovered in a sermon before the Right Honourable the House of Peers, in Parliament now assembled. Upon the monthly fast, March 25. 1646. / By Tho. Case, preacher in Milkstreet London, and one of the Assembly of Divines.
London: printed by Ruth Raworth for Luke Fawne, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
You see there be Two branches in this Doctrine.
1. That a Deliverance of Gods own purposing and forming, may meet with sharp encounters and desperate set-backs. 2. That a Moses himself may at the first blush look upon it, at such a non-plus, as a lost design, a no-deliverance at all.
1. That a Deliverance of Gods own purposing and forming, may meet with sharp encounters and desperate set-backs. 2. That a Moses himself may at the first blush look upon it, at such a non-plus, as a lost designe, a no-deliverance at all.
These are of such a various nature, that they well deserve to be handled distinctly: But fullness of matter, and straits of time, will necessitate me to handle them both together; ⟨p. 4⟩which yet may be easilier done in the instances then in the Reasons of the Doctrine; they being of a most differing account; and therefore when I come to the Reasons, I must take leave of the Second Branch, to pursue the account of the first only.
These are of such a various nature, that they well deserve to be handled distinctly: But fulnesse of matter, and straits of time, will necessitate me to handle them both together; ⟨p. 4⟩which yet may be easilier done in the instances then in the Reasons of the Doctrine; they being of a most differing account; and therefore when I come to the Reasons, I must take leave of the Second Branch, to pursue the account of the first onely.