A81249:371
The quarrel of the covenant, with the pacification of the quarrel. Delivered in three…The quarrell of the covenant, with the pacification of the quarrell. Delivered in three…
The quarrel of the covenant, with the pacification of the quarrel. Delivered in three sermons on Levit. 26. 25. and Jere. 50. 5. / By Thomas Case, preacher of the Word in Milk-street, London; and one of the Assembly of Divines.The quarrell of the covenant, with the pacification of the quarrell. Delivered in three sermons on Levit. 26. 25. and Jere. 50. 5. / By Thomas Case, preacher of the Word in Milk-street, London; and one of the Assembly of Divines.
London: printed for Luke Fawne, 1643
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. Who doubts but that Religion and Laws (wherein the Rights and Liberties of Kingdoms are bound up) are the best security of the persons and authority of Kings and Governors? And the while Kings will defend these, these will defend Kings? It being impossible that Princes should suffer violence or indignity, while they are within the Munition of Religion and Laws; or if the Prince suffer, these must of necessity suffer with him.
3. Who doubts but that Religion and Laws (wherein the Rights and Liberties of Kingdoms are bound up) are the best security of the persons and authority of Kings and Governours? And the while Kings will defend these, these will defend Kings? It being impossible that Princes should suffer violence or indignity, while they are within the Munition of Religion and Laws; or if the Prince suffer, these must of necessity suffer with him.
4. I make a question, Whether this limitation lie any more upon the defence of the Kings person and authority, then it doth upon the Rights and Privileges of Parliaments, and the Liberties of the Kingdom, since there is no point or stop in the Article to appropriate it more to the defence of the Kings Person and Authority, th•n to the preservation of the Rights and Privileges ⟨p. 55⟩ledges of the Parliaments, and the Liberties of the Kingdoms.
4. I make a question, Whether this limitation lie any more upon the defence of the Kings person and authority, then it doth upon the Rights and Privil•dges of Parliaments, and the Liberties of the Kingdom, since there is no point or stop in the Article to appropriate it more to the defence of the Kings Person and Authority, th•n to the preservation of the Rights and Priviledges ⟨p. 55⟩