A85313:144
Presbyterial ordination vindicated. In a brief and sober discourse concerning episcopacy, as claiming greater…
Presbyterial ordination vindicated. In a brief and sober discourse concerning episcopacy, as claiming greater power, and more eminent offices by divine right, then presbytery. The arguments of the Reverend Bishop Dr Davenant in his determination for such episcopacy are modestly examined. And arguments for the validity of presbyterial ordination added. With a brief discourse concerning imposed forms of prayer, and ceremonies. Written by G.F. minister of the gospel in defence of his own ordination, being questioned, because it was performed by Presbyters.Presbyterial ordination vindicated. In a brief and sober discourse concerning episcopacy, as claiming greater power, and more eminent offices by divine right, then presbyterie. The arguments of the Reverend Bishop Dr Davenant in his determination for such episcopacy are modestly examined. And arguments for the validity of presbyterial ordination added. With a brief discourse concerning imposed forms of prayer, and ceremonies. Written by G.F. minister of the gospel in defence of his own ordination, being questioned, because it was performed by Presbyters.
London: printed for Nathanael Webb, 1660
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
His next is, the Angel of Pergamus and Thiatira, blamed Rev. 2. for suffering of Jezebel, &c.
1. Answ. Does this exclude the other Presbyters? What mean those words, [Greek or Hebrew], v. 24. But to you I say. If the King writes to the Speaker, and reproves something amiss, or complains something is not done, does it lay the blame on him only, and not on the Members of the House as well?
1. Answ. Does this exclude the other Presbyters? What mean those words, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, v. 24. But to you I say. If the King writes to the Speaker, and reproves somthing amiss, or complains somthing is not done, does it lay the blame on him only, and not on the Members of the House as well?
2. Suppose these Angels had been guilty of sins for which themselves had deserved excommunication, who should have cast them out? Are they Lords Paramount above all Christs Laws in his Church? I know not but the other Presbyters with the consent of the Churches, obeying their Presbyters, might have cast these Angels out, or no way that I know of. The Scriptures know no Archbishops, though the Papists and Dr. Hammond do.