A85329:226
London's gate to the Lords Table. Where the eldership doth sit doing their office…Londons gate to the Lords Table. Where the eldership doth sit doing their office…
London's gate to the Lords Table. Where the eldership doth sit doing their office aright, in discovering and shutting out the ignorant, profane, and mere civill honest man : in suspending the suspected formal, legal, and antinomisticall professor, and in drawing in the weakest humble believing soul. In a dialogue between a minister of the Gospel. Alexander an ignorant profane man. Simon a proud professor. And Matthias an humble penitent. Imprimatur Edmund Calamy.Londons gate to the Lords Table. Where the eldership doth sit doing their office aright, in discovering and shutting out the ignorant, prophane, and meere civill honest man : in suspending the suspected formall, legall, and antinomisticall professor, and in drawing in the weakest humble beleeving soule. In a dialogue betweene a minister of the Gospell. Alexander an ignorant prophane man. Simon a proud professor. And Matthias an humble penitent. Imprimatur Edmund Calamy.
London: printed for John Wright, 1646London: printed for Iohn Wright, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Sim. Then Sir, it seems that a man cannot by having the one, be assured that he hath also the other.
Min. No indeed, if he have them not both he hath neither of them, for as there is no imputed righteousness going before, where infused righteousness followeth not after, so is there no infused ⟨p. 123⟩righteousness following after, where imputed righteousness hath not gone before; so that if either of them be wanting, and bear not witness to the other, and that in its due place, according to Gods own order, and as his own distinct actions, they are neither of them true.
Min. No indeed, if he have them not both he hath neither of them, for as there is no imputed righteousnesse going before, where infused righteousnesse followeth not after, so is there no infused ⟨p. 123⟩righteousnesse following after, where imputed righteousnesse hath not gone before; so that if either of them be wanting, and beare not witnesse to the other, and that in its due place, according to Gods owne order, and as his owne distinct actions, they are neither of them true.
Sim. Then Sir, I pray you tell me how a man may know that he hath them both, and that they do bear witness either to other, and that in their due place according to Gods own order, and as his own distinct actions.
Sim. Then Sir, I pray you tell me how a man may know that he hath them both, and that they doe beare witnesse either to other, and that in their due place according to Gods owne order, and as his owne distinct actions.