A89732:647
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I dare almost say (saith Grotius, 1a man excelling in this kind of learning) that where there is consent there is not any of all those whom we call Pagans who would esteem it unjust that one should be punished for the delinquency of another.
I dare almost say (saith Grotius, 1a man excelling in this kinde of learning) that where there is consent there is not any of all those whom we call Pagans who would esteem it unjust that one should be punished for the delinquency of another.
- 1Caterùm ubi consensus, &c. Grotius de satisfacti-Christ. c. 6.
Dialogu. And this distinction of the souls case from the bodies case may sufficiently serve as an answer to M. Reynolds who doth labour to justify the imputation of our sins unto our innocent Saviour in Psa. 110. p. 444. 445.
Dialogu. And this distinction of the souls case from the bodies case may sufficiently serve as an answer to M. Reynolds who doth labour to iustifie the imputation of our sins unto our innocent Saviour in Psa. 110. p. 444. 445.
Answ. This distinction of the case of the body in this life liable, and the case of the soul not liable unto punishment is grounded upon presumption of that which is not, namely, such an act wherein the body is guilty, and the soul both guiltless and uncapable of guilt either inherently or imputatively.