A89732:715
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If upon a supposition this untruth were a truth, yet 'tis impertinent to the question, being neither beneficial to the tenet of the Author, nor prejudicial to the tenet of the Orthodox.
If upon a supposition this untruth were a truth, yet 'tis impertinent to the question, being neither beneficial to the tenet of the Authour, nor prejudiciall to the tenet of the Orthodox.
Dialogu But yet withal take notice that the term He Gen. 3.15. doth comprehend under it his humane nature as well as his divine, yea, it doth also comprehend under it the Personal union of both his Natures.
Dialogu But yet withall take notice that the term He Gen. 3.15. doth comprehend under it his humane nature as well as his divine, yea, it doth also comprehend under it the Personal union of both his Natures.
Answ. Then the term He Gen. 3.15. notes the Person consisting ⟨p. 152⟩of both natures; therefore not the Divine nature only: but the person consisting of both natures was the Priest. The Term He in the other Scriptures being by your own acknowledgement of the same sense with the term He Gen. 3.15. you hereby unsay what you just now said, or otherwise what was said, was nothing to the purpose.