A89732:797
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Christs death was in some respect miraculous and supernatural, and in some respect not miraculous but natural; as Christs natural so his supernatural death was miraculous, but it doth not follow it was miraculous, therefore it was not; the contrary followeth, his supernatural death was miraculous, therefore it was.
Christs death was in some respect miraculous and supernatural, and in some respect not miraculous but natural; as Christs natural so his supernatural death was miracalous, but it doth not follow it was miraculous, therefore it was not; the contrary followeth, his supernatural death was miraculous, therefore it was.
Dialogu Christ died not by degrees (saith M. Nichols in his Day-Star) as his Saints do, his senses do not decay, &c.
Dialogu Christ died not by degrees (saith M. Nichols in his Day-Starre) as his Saints do, his senses do not decay, &c.
Answ. Others say the same, who notwithstanding teach the doctrine of imputation and Christs suffering of the wrath of God, the one opposeth not the other. Whether Christs pains were so ended when he said, It was finished, as that his death was without pain (which yet I believe not) is not the question, but whether Christ suffered the wrath of God.
Answ. Others say the same, who notwithstanding teach the doctrine of imputation and Christs suffering of the wrath of God, the one opposeth not the other. Whether Christs pains were so ended when he said, It was finished, as that his death was without pain (which yet I beleeve not) is not the question, but whether Christ suffered the wrath of God.