A89732:808
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The death of Christ (saith D. Ames) was true not feigned;1 it was natural from causes naturally efficacious to procure it, not supernatural, it was voluntary, not plainly constrained; yet it was violent. It was also in some respect supernatural and miraculous, because Christ conserved his strength and life so long as he would, and laid them down when he would.
- 1Mors ista Christi fuit vera non ficta. &c. Med. l. 1. c. 22. th. 27
Dialogu Hence we learn that the doctrine of the Papists and Lutherans in their transubstantiation and consubstantiation is very erroneous; for they place the meritorious price of their Redemption in the gross substance of Christs flesh and blood, and in the passive shedding of it upon the Cross by the Romans.
Dialogu Hence we learn that the doctrine of the Papists and Lutherans in their transubstantiation and consubstantiation is very erroneous; for they place the meritorious price of their Redemption in the grosse substance of Christs flesh and bloud, and in the passive shedding of it upon the Crosse by the Romans.
Answ. Neither the Papists nor Lutherans look at the blood of Christ as the blood of a mere man, but as the blood of God-man.
Answ. Neither the Papists nor Lutherans look at the bloud of Christ as the bloud of a meer man, but as the bloud of God-man.