A89732:831
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Law of God (saith Zanchy) speaking of the Law of Moses, 1given in the interim, between the promise of Redemption, made first to Adam, afterwards to Abraham, and the fulfilling thereof; is nothing else but a true and lively expressed picture of the image of God, according to which man was created.
The Law of God (saith Zanchy) speaking of the Law of Moses, 1given in the interim, between the promise of Redemption, made first to Adam, afterwards to Abraham, and the fullfilling thereof; is nothing else but a true and lively expressed picture of the image of God, according to which man was created.
- 1Zanch. de rel gione Christiana sidei. To. 8 cap. 10. aphor. 3.
Here again the Reader is to keep in mind that the […] ⟨p. 181⟩Dialogue is all this while besides the Question, for our Query is not, Whether the ten Commandments in the full latitude of them were given to Adam in innocency: but whether the obedience of Christ to the Law (that is, to the Law as given to Adam in innocency) were for our Justification? whose affirmative by the way appeareth thus.
Here again the Reader is to keep in minde that the 〈…〉 ⟨p. 181⟩Dialogue is all this while besides the Question, for our Quere is not, Whether the ten Commandments in the full latitude of them were given to Adam in innocency: but whether the obedience of Christ to the Law (that is, to the Law as given to Adam in innocency) were for our Justification? whose affirmative by the way appeareth thus.