A89732:954
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
That Atonement or pardon of sin only (especially such as denieth the Legal Obedience of Christ imputed) cannot be the righteousness of a sinner, is proved thus.
That Atonement or pardon of sin only (especially such as denieth the Legal Obedience of Christ imputed) cannot be the righteousnesse of a sinner, is proved thus.
The difference of the nature of justice and pardon of sin, manifests that pardon of sin only is not justice or righteousness.
The difference of the nature of justice and pardon of sin, manifests that pardon of sin only is not justice or righteousnesse.
Pardon and sinlessness take away deformity in respect of the Law, but righteousness consists in a conformity unto the Law.
Pardon and sinlessenesse take away deformity in respect of the Law, but righteousnesse consists in a conformity unto the Law.