A89737:1291
The orthodox evangelist. Or A treatise wherein many great evangelical truths (not a few…
The orthodox evangelist. Or A treatise wherein many great evangelical truths (not a few whereof are much opposed and eclipsed in this perilous hour of the passion of the Gospel) are briefly discussed, cleared, and confirmed: as a further help, for the begetting, and establishing of the faith which is in Jesus. As also the state of the blessed, where; of the condition of their souls from the instant of their dissolution: and of their persons after their resurrection. By John Norton, teacher of the church at Ipswich in New England.The orthodox evangelist. Or A treatise wherein many great evangelical truths (not a few whereof are much opposed and eclipsed in this perillous hour of the passion of the Gospel) are briefly discussed, cleared, and confirmed: as a further help, for the begeting, and establishing of the faith which is in Jesus. As also the state of the blessed, where; of the condition of their souls from the instant of their dissolution: and of their persons after their resurrection. By John Norton, teacher of the church at Ipswich in New England.
London: printed by John Macock for Henry Cripps, 1654
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This observation (saith Pareus) is firmly to be urged against false teachers,1 because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense, in no wise to signify the making of one righteous, or the infusion of habitual righteousness, which they contend for, but a free absolution from sins, and imputation of righteousness for the merit of Christ. These places being excepted, viz. Dan. 12.3. Rev. 22.11. Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense.
This observation (saith Pareus) is firmly to be urged against false teachers,1 because it doth evince Justification in the Apostles sense, in no wise to signifie the making of one righteous, or the infusion of habitual righteousnesse, which they contend for, but a free absolution from sins, and imputation of righteousnesse for the merit of Christ. These places being excepted, viz. Dan. 12.3. Rev. 22.11. Chamier boldly affirms that there cannot be found another place in Scripture where Justification is used in any other sense.
- 1Haec observatio fermiter tenen•a & urgenda est emtra Sophistas, quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem, quod illi contendunt; sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis, & justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum, Pareus in Rom. 3.28. Praeter unum locum ex Danielis 12. & alterum ex Apocrypho Syracida, ecclesiast. 18. & tertium ex Apocalypsi, his exceptis audacter dico non dari posse alium. Ham. Tom. 3. lib. 21. c. 5. n. 11.Haec observatio fermiter tenena & urgenda est emtra Sophistas, quia evincit justificationem Apostolo nequaquam significare justificationem seu habitualis justitiae infusionem, quod illi contendunt; sed gratuitam absolutionem à peccatis, & justitiae impulationem propter Christi meritum, Pareus in