A90278:151
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now I had Three Reasons (among others) that prevailed with me to make Gracious Condonation of so large extent, which I shall Express, and leave them to the thoughts of every Judicious Reader, whether they are enforcing thereunto, or no; being exceedingly indifferent what his Determination is: For the weight of my Answer depends not on it at all.
Now I had Three Reasons (among others) that prevailed with me to make Gracious Condonation of so large extent, which I shall Expresse, and leave them to the thoughts of every Judicious Reader, whether they are enforcing thereunto, or no; being exceedingly indifferent what his Determination is: For the weight of my Answer depends not on it at all.
And they are these:
1, Because that single Act of remission of sins to particular persons, (which is nothing but a dissolution of the Obligation of the Law, as unto them, whereby they are bound over to Punishment) as it is commonly restrained, is affirmed by them whom Grotius in that Book opposed (into ⟨p. 22⟩whose Tents he was afterwards a Renegado) to be inconsistent with any Satisfaction at all; yea, that which Grotius maintains per tantundem. But now if you extend that Gospel phrase to the Compass I have mentioned, they have not the least Colour so to do.
1, Because that single Act of remission of sins to particular persons, (which is nothing but a disolution of the Obligation of the Law, as unto them, whereby they are bound over to Punishment) as it is commonly restrained, is affirmed by them whom Grotius in that Book opposed (into ⟨p. 22⟩