A90278:53
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1 He looks upon the Stating of the Question as I professedly laid it down at my entrance into that Disputation, and declares, That it is nothing at all to the Question he hath in hand, nor looking that way.
He distinguisheth (saith M. Baxter) betwixt paying the very thing that is in the Obligation, and paying of so much in another kind: Now this is not our Question, nor any thing to it. Append. p. 137.
If it be so, I know no reason why I was plucked in to the following Dispute, nor why M. Baxter should cast away so many Pages of his Book, upon that which is nothing at all to the business he had in hand.
But though there be nothing to this purpose, Page 137 of my Book, the place he was sent to, yet Page 140 there is: As also something contrary to what is expressed in the former Place, which he intimates in these words;
In Page 140, he states the Question far otherwise, (and yet supposeth it the same) viz. Whether Christ paid the idem, or the tantundum? which he interpreteth thus, (that which is not the same, nor equivalent unto it, but only in the Gracious acceptation of the Creditor: Now what he means by (not equivalent) I cannot tell.