A90278:542
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
On these Two, I say it is, That our Right to the Fruits of the Death of Christ, even before believing, doth depend: from hence at least it is right and equal, That we do in the time appointed enjoy these things. Yea to say, That we have Right upon believing to the Fruits of the Death of Christ affirmed universally, can only be affirmed of a Jus in re, such a Right, as hath (at least in part) conjoined actual Possession, believing it self being no small Portion of these Fruits.
On these Two, I say it is, That our Right to the Fruits of the Death of Christ, even before beleeving, doth depend: from hence at least it is right and equal, That we do in the time appointed enjoy these things. Yea to say, That we have Right upon beleeving to the Fruits of the Death of Christ affirmed universally, can only be affirmed of a Jus in re, such a Right, as hath (at least in part) conjoyned actual Possession, beleeving it self being no smal Portion of these Fruits.
This Argument then being fallacious, omitting the chief Causes in Annumeration, concludes not the thing proposed. Besides it is in no small measure faulty, in that the ⟨p. 95⟩first thing proposed to be confirmed was, That Remission of Sin, and Justification are not the immediate Effects of Christs Death, whereof in this Argument there is [Greek or Hebrew].
This Argument then being fallacious, omitting the chief Causes in Annumeration, concludes not the thing proposed. Besides it is in no small measure faulty, in that the ⟨p. 95⟩first thing proposed to be confirmed was, That Remission of Sin, and Justification are not the immediate Effects of Christs Death, whereof in this Argument there is 〈non-Latin alphabet〉.