A90278:551
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answ. 1 If I mistake not, it is not Justification before Faith, but a Right to the Fruits of the Death of Christ before Faith that is to be proved.
2 That Justification is not the immediate Effect of the Death of Christ to which Ends for this Argument, Valeat quantum valere potest: to me, it comes not within many miles of the thing in Question. So that with the absurd ⟨p. 96⟩ANSWERS supposed thereunto, we pass it by.
2 That Justification is not the immediate Effect of the Death of Christ to which Ends for this Argument, Valeat quantum valere potest: to me, it comes not within many miles of the thing in Question. So that with the absurd ⟨p. 96⟩ANSWERS supposed thereunto, we passe it by.
The like also I am enforced to say of the Two other that follow, being of the same length and breadth with those foregoing, too short & narrow to cover the things in Question so that though they may have their strength to their own proper End, yet as to the things proposed to be proved, there is nothing in their Genuine Conclusions looking that way.