A90278:82
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Or will he deny it to be equivalent in Gods Gracious Acceptance? this he also contendeth for himself. Though refusable, yet equivalent.
What then is my Crime? I wrong Grotius! Wherein? in imposing on him, that he should say, It was not of equal value to the Idem▪ that Christ paid. Not one such word, in any of the places mentioned. I say, Grotius maintains, That the satisfaction of Christ, was solutio tantidem. Will you deny it? Is it not his main endeavour to prove it so? Again, tantundem I say is not in this case equivalent to Idem, [Greek or Hebrew], but only [Greek or Hebrew]: doth not M. B. labour to prove the same? Where then is the difference? Were it not for Ignoratio Elenchi in the Bottom, and Fallacia plurium interrogationum at the Top, this Discourse would have been very empty.
What then is my Crime? I wrong Grotius! Wherein? in imposing on him, that he should say, It was not of equal value to the Idem▪ that Christ paid. Not one such word, in any of the places mentioned. I say, Grotius maintains, That the satisfaction of Christ, was solutio tantidem. Will you deny it? Is it not his main endeavour to prove it so? Again, tantundem I say is not in this case equivalent to Idem, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, but only 〈non-Latin alphabet〉: doth not M. B. labour to prove the same? Where then is the difference? Were it not for Ignoratio Elenchi in the Bottom, and Fallacia plurium interrogationum at the Top, this Discourse would have been very empty.
2, But he casts my words into another Frame, to give their sense another Appearance; and saith,