A90278:96
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made.…
Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleared, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.Of the death of Christ, the price he paid, and the purchase he made. Or, the satisfaction, and merit of the death of Christ cleered, the universality of redemption thereby oppugned: and the doctrine concerning these things formerly delivered in a treatise against universal redemption vindicated from the exceptions, and objections of Mr Baxter. / By J. Owen, minister of the gospel.
London: printed by Peter Cole, 1650
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2 Whether the Penalty due to One, may not be undergone by Another? and if so, Whether it be not the same Penalty (the idem) or no? In things Real, I gave an Instance before: If a man pay twenty pounds for another who owed it, doth not he pay the idem in the Obligation? And may not this hold in things Personal also?
2 Whether the Penalty due to One, may not be undergon by Another? and if so, Whether it be not the same Penalty (the idem) or no? In things Real, I gave an Instance before: If a man pay twenty pounds for another who owed it, doth not he pay the idem in the Obligation? And may not this hold in things Personal also?
Of the Satisfaction of Christ procuring it's End ipso facto, (I mean in it's own kind, for the Death of Christ must be considered as Meritorious, as well as Satisfactory if deliverance be attended as the End of it) I shall speak ⟨p. 13⟩afterwards in it's proper place. The present Controversy is no more but this;
Of the Satisfaction of Christ procuring it's End ipso facto, (I mean in it's own kind, for the Death of Christ must be considered as Meritorious, as well as Satisfactory if deliverance be attended as the End of it) I shall speak ⟨p. 13⟩afterwards in it's proper place. The present Controversie is no more but this;
Whether Christ underwent the Penalty threatened unto us, or some other thing accepted in stead thereof, by a new Constitution? Which is all one, Whether in laying our iniquities upon Christ, the Law of God was relaxed only as to the Persons suffering, or also as to the Penalty suffered? That is, Whether Christ paid the idem in the Obligation, or tantundum? To suppose that the idem of the Obligation is not only the Penalty it self, but also the Offenders own suffering that Penalty, and then to enquire, Whether Christ underwent the idem, is to create an easy Enemy, to triumph in his dejection.