A90293:169
Theomachia autexousiastikē
Theomachia autexousiastikē: or, A display of Arminianism. Being a discovery of the old Pelagian idol free-will, with the new goddess contingency, advancing themselves, into the throne of the God of heaven to the prejudice of his grace, providence, and supreme dominion over the children of men. Wherein the main errors of the Arminians are laid open, by which they are fallen off from the received doctrine of all the reformed churches, with their opposition in divers particulars to the doctrine established in the Church of England. Discovered out of their own writings and confessions, and confuted by the Word of God. / By John Owen, Master of Arts of Queens College in Oxon.Theomachia autexousiastikē: or, A display of Arminianisme. Being a discovery of the old Pelagian idol free-will, with the new goddesse contingency, advancing themselves, into the throne of the God of heaven to the prejudice of his grace, providence, and supreme dominion over the children of men. Wherein the maine errors of the Arminians are laid open, by which they are fallen off from the received doctrine of all the reformed churches, with their opposition in divers particulars to the doctrine established in the Church of England. Discovered out of their owne writings and confessions, and confuted by the Word of God. / By Iohn Owen, Master of Arts of Queens Colledge in Oxon.
London: printed by I.L. for Phil. Stephens, 1643
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And here observe, that this doth not thwart my former assertion, where I showed, that they deny the election of any particular persons, which here they seem to grant upon a fore-sight of their faith, and good works: for there is not any one person, as such a person, notwithstanding all this, that in their judgement is in this life elected: but only as he is considered with those qualifications, of which he may at any time divest himself, and so become again to be no more elected then Judas.
And here observe, that this doth not thwart my former assertion, where I shewed, that they deny the election of any particular persons, which here they seeme to grant upon a fore-sight of their faith, and good workes: for there is not any one person, as such a person, notwithstanding all this, that in their judgement is in this life elected: but onely as he is considered with those qualifications, of which he may at any time divest himselfe, and so become againe to be no more elected then Iudas.
The sum of their Doctrine in this particular, is laid by one of ours in a Tract entitled Gods love to mankind, &c. a Book full of palpable ignorance, gross sophistry, and abominable blasphemy, whose Author seems to have proposed nothing unto himself, but to rake all the dunghills of a few the most invective Arminians, and to collect the most filthy scum and pollution ⟨p. 60⟩of their railings to cast upon the truth of God, and under I know not what self-coined pretences, belch out odious blasphemies against his holy name.
The summe of their Doctrine in this particular, is laid by one of ours in a Tract intituled Gods love to mankinde, &c. a Booke full of palpable ignorance, grosse sophistrie, and abominable blasphemie, whose Authour seemes to have proposed nothing unto himselfe, but to rake all the dunghils of a few the most invective Arminians, and to collect the most filthy scumme and pollution ⟨p. 60⟩