1. They undermine, and overthrow, the eternity of Gods purposes, by affirming, that (in the order of the divine decrees, there are some which precede, every act of the creature, and some again, that follow them) soa Corvinus the most famous, of that sect; now all the acts of every creature, being but of yesterday, temporary, like themselves, surely, those decrees of God, cannot be eternal, which follow them in order of time: and yet they press this, especially, in respect of humane actions, as a certain, unquestionable verity: (it is certain that God willeth or determineth, many things, which he would not, did not some act of mans will, go before it) saith their greater Masterb Arminius: the like affirmeth, with a little addition, (as such men do always proficere in peius,) his genuine scholar Nic. cGrevinchovius, I suppose (saith he) that God willeth many things, which he neither would, nor justly could will, and purpose, did not some action of the creature precede: and here observe that in these places, they speak not of Gods external works, of those actions, which out wardly are of him, as inflicting of punishments, bestowing of rewards, and other such outward acts of his providence, whose administration we confess to be various, and diversly applied to several occasions: but of the internal purposes of Gods will, his decrees, and intentions which have no present influence upon, or respect unto, any action of the creature: yea they deny that concerning many things, God hath any determinate resolution at all, or any purpose, further, then a natural affection towards them: God doth, or omitteth, that, towards which, in his own nature, and his proper inclination, he is affected, as he finds man, to comply, or not to comply, with that order, which he hath appointed, saithd Corvinus: surely, these men care not, what indignities they cast upon the God of heaven, so they may maintain the pretended endowments of their own wills; for such an absolute power do they here ascribe unto them, that God himself, cannot determine ⟨p. 7⟩of a thing, whereunto, as they strangely phrase it, he is well affected, before, by an actual concurrence, he is sure of their compliance: now this imputation, that they are temporary, which they cast upon the decrees of God in general, they press home upon that particular, which lies most in their way, the decree of election:
1. They undermine, and overthrow, the eternitie of Gods purposes, by affirming, that (in the order of the divine decrees, there are some which precede, every act of the creature, and some againe, that follow them) soa Corvinus the most famous, of that sect; now all the acts of every creature, being but of yesterday, temporary, like themselves, surely, those decrees of God, cannot be eternall, which follow them in order of time: and yet they presse this, especially, in respect of humane actions, as a certaine, unquestionable veritie: (it is certaine that God willeth or determineth, many things, which he would not, did not some act of mans will, goe before it) saith their greater Masterb Arminius: the like affirmeth, with a little addition, (as such men do alwayes proficere in peius,) his genuine scholler Nic. cGrevinchovius, I suppose (saith he) that God willeth many things, which he neither would, nor iustly could will, and purpose, did not some action of the creature precede: and here observe that in these places, they speak not of Gods externall works, of those actions, which out wardly are of him, as inflicting of punishments, bestowing of rewards, and other such outward acts of his providence, whose administration we confesse to be various, and diversly applyed to severall occasions: but of the internall purposes of Gods will, his decrees, and intentions which have no present influence upon, or respect unto, any action of the creature: yea they deny that concerning many things, God hath any determinate resolution at all, or any purpose, further, then a naturall affection towards them: God doth, or omitteth, that, towards which, in his owne nature, and his proper inclination, he is affected, as he findes man, to comply, or not to comply, with that order, which he hath appointed, saithd Corvinus: surely, these men care not, what indignities they cast upon the God of heaven, so they may maintaine the pretended endowments of their own wils; for such an absolute power do they here ascribe unto them, that God himself, cannot determine ⟨p. 7⟩of a thing, whereunto, as they strangely phrase it, he is well affected, before, by an actuall coucurrence, he is sure of their complyance: now this imputation, that they are temporary, which they cast upon the decrees of God in generall, they presse home upon that particular, which lies most in their way, the decree of election:
- a[…], quaedam sunt quae omnem actum […] quaedam quae […]. cap. 5. see. 1. pag 67.〈…〉, quaedam sunt quae omnem actum 〈…〉 quaedam quae 〈…〉. cap. 5. see. 1. pag 67.
- bCertum est Deum quaedam velle, quae non velle ni•i aliqua […] humana antecederet, A• min. Antipe. k•p 211.Certum est Deum quaedam velle, quae non velle ni•i aliqua 〈…〉 humana antecederet, A• min. Antipe. k•p 211.
- cMulta tamen arbitror Deum velle, quae non vellet, adeoque nec just• velle posset, nisi aliqua actio creatu•• praece le•et▪ ad Ames. pag. 24.
- dDeus facit vel non facit […], ad quod, […], & natura […] inclinatione […] est • prou• […] cum isto ordine consp••at vel non consp•a• […] ad […] cap. 5. ad see. 3.Deus facit vel non facit 〈…〉, ad quod, 〈…〉, & natura 〈…〉 inclinatione 〈…〉 est • prou• 〈…〉 cum isto ordine consp••at vel non consp•a• 〈…〉 ad cap. 5. ad see. 3.