A92138:1118
The divine right of church-government and excommunication
The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peaceable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justified, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examined; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peacable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justifi'd, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examin'd; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field for Christopher Meredith, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Erastus. Jehoshaphat, 2 Chron. 19. did not depart from Moses1 ⟨p. 411⟩his Law: But we read not, that there were two distinct Jurisdictions commanded and instituted by God.
Erastus. Jehoshaphat, 2 Chron. 19. did not depart from Moses1 ⟨p. 411⟩his Law: But we read not, that there were two distinct Iurisdictions commanded and instituted by God.
- 1Page 274.
Ans. If this be a good Argument; all that David and Solomon did for, and in the building of the Temple in the structure, form, length, breadth, Cedars, gold, Altars, &c. of the Temple shall be without Warrant; Solomon and David departed not from Moses: But Moses spake nothing of the Temple, and a thousand things of Divine institution in the Temple.
Ans. If this be a good Argument; all that David and Solomon did for, and in the building of the Temple in the structure, forme, length, breadth, Cedars, gold, Altars, &c. of the Temple shall be without Warrant; Solomon and David departed not from Moses: But Moses spake nothing of the Temple, and a thousand things of Divine institution in the Temple.