A92138:1741
The divine right of church-government and excommunication
The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peaceable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justified, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examined; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peacable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justifi'd, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examin'd; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field for Christopher Meredith, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Hence observe 1. The materials of worship, as linen, clothes, habits, gestures may be in their physical consideration indifferent, but as applied by formulists, they cannot be indifferent, for in their use, kneeling appropriated to sacramental bread, linen appropriated to the body of a Priest, while he officiateth, cannot be but religious or profane. 2. If God command gestures he commandeth this gesture, hic & nunc. If in general, ••ealing be forbidden, then for Achan, to steal this Babylonish garment, must be forbidden. 3. It seemeth to have been after-noon with Henry Leslie (a) of after cups, when he saith, if Papists and Protestants be two divers kinds ⟨p. 8⟩of worshippers then their actions of worship must be indifferent, as be their agents, for actions are distinguished by their objects and ends, Papists in kneeling worship their God of bread, we in kneeling at the Sacrament worship the true God. For when a Turk and a Christian do both worship Dagon, it is the same Idolatry, though turkism and Christianism be different religions. Though kneeling to an Image, the similitude of God, and that same kneeling to Jehovah, represented in that similitude, Es▪ 40. v. 8. make one formal object, the Image the material, Jehovah the formal object▪ yet is it idolatry. 4. Our circumstances of time and place, cannot properly be called indifferent, for they may be considered two ways. 1 Physically. 2 Religiously. Physically. The Commandment enjoining a thing, enjoineth also time and place convenient, he that saith (th• shalt not kill) in that same very Commandment said (Cain, thou shalt not kill Abel in this place of the field, at this time,) so to believe, and to believe in this time and place, falleth both under one, and the same Commandment; And it is true, the lawfulness of Worship may be marred by bad Circumstantiating of the worship, If one shall pray, when the Pastor doth preach; But Circumstances must be convenient, and so commanded, and so not indifferent, but Circumstances have no religious respect put on them by God, and therefore in that state have no room in Gods worship,
Hence observe 1. The materialls of worship, as linnen, cloathes, habites, gestures may be in their physicall consideration indifferent, but as applyed by formulistes, they cannot be indifferent, for in their use, kneeling appropriated to sacramentall bread, linnen appropriated to the body of a Priest, while he officiateth, cannot be but religious or prophane. 2. If God command gestures he commandeth this gesture, hic & nunc. If in generall, ealing be forbidden, then for Achan, to steale this Babylonish garment, must be forbidden. 3. It seemeth to have been after-noon with Henry Lesly (