A92138:374
The divine right of church-government and excommunication
The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peaceable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justified, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examined; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peacable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justifi'd, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examin'd; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field for Christopher Meredith, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. Let it be considered what is said by the fJesuit Joannes de Lugo, the Popes Professor at Rome, which I propound with some change: 1. There is a purpose of external Adoring, with an inward submission of the heart; whether this be an habitual or actual intention, it▪ is sure it is an Adoration, when it cometh forth in a gesture of Adoring. 2. A will to bow the body in scorn and derision, as the Soldiers bowed the knee before Jesus; and this being not in a state of worshipping, but in a state and •ase of disgracing, is not Religious bowing or Adoration: This is not a natural expression of inward submission, but rather of disgrace. 3. There is a willed or voluntary Religious bowing for fear, for gain, or for glory; yet without any internal estimation of the excellency of the thing Adored. This Suarez denieth to be worshipping, it being only a feigning of worship, not a worshipping.2
3. Let it be considered what is said by the fJesuit Joannes de Lugo, the Popes Professor at Rome, which I propound with some change: 1. There is a purpose of externall Adoring, with an inward submission of the heart; whether this be an habituall or actuall intention, it▪ is sure it is an Adoration, when it cometh forth in a gesture of Adoring. 2. A will to bow the body in scorn and derision, as the Souldiers bowed the knee before Iesus; and this being not in a state of worshipping, but in a state and •ase of disgracing, is not Religious bowing or Adoration: This is not a naturall expression of inward submission, but rather of disgrace. 3. There is a willed or voluntary Religious bowing for fear, for gain, or for glory; yet without any internall estimation of the excellency of the thing Adored. This Suarez denyeth to be worshipping, it being only a faining of worship, not a worshipping.2
- fJoannes de Lugo, de myster. incarna•, dis. 23. Sect. 2. n. 23.