A92140:429
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgic Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawless liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgick Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawlesse liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.
London: printed by R.I. for Andrew Crook, 1649
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
CHAP. XIV. Cavils against coercive judicial Laws, for punishing false prophets in the Old Testament removed.
CHAP. XIV. Cavils against coercive judiciall Laws, for punishing false prophets in the Old Testament removed.
THE first common Answer made to all these, is: That these were judicial and Old Testament Laws, when God dealt more strictly with the Jews, and hedged them in with severer laws, penalties, and a greater measure of bondage, then now under the meek and gentle reign of the Messiah.1
THE first common Answer made to all these, is: That these were judiciall and Old Testament Laws, when God dealt more strict•y with the Jews, and hedged them in with severer laws, penalties, and a greater measure of bondage, then now under the meek and gentle reign of the Messiah.1
- 1Laws punishing false teachers were moral, not temporary and pedagogical▪Laws punishing false teachers were morall, not temporary and pedagogicall▪