A92140:611
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgic Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawless liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgick Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawlesse liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.
London: printed by R.I. for Andrew Crook, 1649
Chapter 21: Of the Samaritans, and of no compelling of Heathens. How the Covenant bindeth us.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Covenant with a fair interpretation may be urged against Presbyterians, and for the Congregational way, as well as otherwise. The Covenant binds no man, nor number of men to State or Church for their parts respectively, to any pattern or degree of Reformation, conformity or uniformity with other Churches, but what shall satisfactorily to them and each of their consciences, appear to be according to the word of God; and such a Reformation do the Congregational men desire, pray, preach, endeavour for and after, in the pursuance of the Covenant, as if there had been no such outward Covenant obliging them, would ye have men driven in droves to the Sacrament still, and the precious and the vile mixed? and Idol-shepherds suffered? and Bishops Courts, and Consistories continued? had these been beaten down, had not we under God, as a forlorn hope first given them battle? how can ye say, we hinder Reformation? when we are for a further and purer Reformation (your selves being judges?) you would •it down on this side Jordan, we would advance? Si• you quiet, if you will not help us, as we helped you.
The Covenant with a faire interpretation may be urged against Presbyterians, and for the Congregationall way, as well as otherwise. The Covenant binds no man, nor number of men to State or Church for their parts respectively, to any paterne or degree of Reformation, conformity or uniformity with other Churches, but what shall satisfactorily to them and each of their consciences, appeare to be according to the word of God; and such a Reformation doe the Congregationall men desire, pray, preach, endeavovr for and after, in the pursuance of the Covenant, as if there had beene no such outward Covenant obliging them, would yee have men driven in droves to the Sacrament still, and the pretious and the vile mixed? and Idol-shepheards suffered? and Bishops Courts, and Consistories continued? had these beene beaten downe, had not we under God, as a forlorne hope first given them battell? how can ye say, we hinder Reformation? when we are for a further and purer Reformation (your selves being judges?) you would •it down on this side Jordan, we would advance? Si• you quiet, if you will not helpe us, as we helped you.