A92147:1059
A treatise of civil policy
A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and privilege, in reference to the supreme prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divinity of St Andrews in Scotland.A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and priviledge, in reference to the supream prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divintiy of St Andrews in Scotland.
London, : Printed and are to be sold by Simon Miller at the Star in St Pauls Church-yard near the West end., 1657 i.e. 1656
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Lex, Rex. › Question 38: QUEST. XXXVIII. Whether Monarchy be the best of governments?
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Assert. 1. An absolute and unlimited Monarchy is not only not1 the best form of Government, but it is the worst, and this is against our Petty Prelate, and all Royalists. My reasons be these, 1. Because it is an unlawful Ordinance, and God never ordained it; and I cannot ascribe the superlative degree to any thing, of which I deny the positive: Absolute government in a sinful and peccable man is a wicked government, and not a power from God, for God never gave a power to sin. Plenitudo potestatis ad malum & injuriam non extenditur. Sozenus Junior cons. 65. in causa occurrenti, l. 2. Ferdinand. Loazes in suo cons. pro March. de Velez. pag. 54. n. 65. And so that learned Senator Ferdin. Vasquez. pag. 1. lib. 1. cap. 5. n. 17. 2. It was better for the State that Epaminondas could not2 sleep, then that he could sleep, when the people was dancing, because, said he, I wake that you may have leave to sleep and be secure; for he was upon deep cogitations, how to do good to the Common-wealth, when the people were upon their pleasures. Because all Kings since the fall of the Father-King Adam, are inclined to sin and injustice, and so had need to be guided by a Law, even because they are Kings, so they remain men. Omnipotency in one that can sin, is a cursed power. With reason all our Divines say, the state of saving grace in the second Adam, where there is non posse deficere, they cannot fall away from God, is better then the3 state of the first Adam, where there was posse non deficere, a power not to fall away; and that our free-will is better in our country in Heaven, where we cannot sin, then in the way to our country on earth, where we have a power to sin, and so Gods people is in a better case, Hos. 2. 6, 7. Where her power to overtake her lovers is closed up with an hedge of thorns that she cannot find her paths; then the condition of Ephraim, of whom God saith, Hos. 4. 17. Ephraim is joined to Idols, let him alone. So cannot that be a good government when the supreme power is in a sinful man, as inclinable to injustice by nature as any man, and more inclinable to injustice by the condition of his place then any: and yet by office he is one that can do no injustice against his subjects; he is a King, and so may destroy Uriah, kill his subjects, but cannot sin; and this is to flattering Royalists the best government in the world.