A92147:470
A treatise of civil policy
A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and privilege, in reference to the supreme prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divinity of St Andrews in Scotland.A treatise of civil policy: being a resolution of forty three questions concerning prerogative, right and priviledge, in reference to the supream prince and the people. / By Samuel Rutherford professor of divintiy of St Andrews in Scotland.
London, : Printed and are to be sold by Simon Miller at the Star in St Pauls Church-yard near the West end., 1657 i.e. 1656
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
for to add such an after-consent, is an act of government. Now as they are conceived to want all government, they cannot perform any act of government. And this is as much against himself, as against us.
for to adde such an after-consent, is an act of government. Now as they are conceived to want all government, they cannot performe any act of government. And this is as much against himselfe, as against us.
2. The power of a part, and the power of the whole is not alike, Royalty never advanceth the King above the place of a member: And Lawyers say, The King is above the subjects, in sensu diviso, in a divisive sense he is above this or that subject: but he is inferior to all the subjects collectively taken, because he is for the whole Kingdom, as a mean for the end. Object. If this be a good reason, that he is a mean for the whole Kingdom, as for the end; that he is therefore inferior to the whole Kingdom: then is he also inferior to any one subject; for he is a mean for the safety of every subject, as for the whole Kingdom. Answ. Every mean is inferior to its complete, adequate and whole end: and such an end is the whole Kingdom ⟨p. 158⟩in relation to the King: but every man is not always inferior to its incomplete, inadequate and partial end. This or that subject is not adequate, but the inadequate and incomplete end in relation to the King. The Prelate saith, Kings are Dii Elohim, Gods;1 and the manner of their propagation is by filiation, by adoption, sons of the most high, and Gods first borne. Now the first borne is not above every brother severally: but if there were thousands, millions, numberless 2numbers, he is above all in precedency and power. Answ. Not only Kings, but all inferior Judges are Gods, Psal. 82. God standeth in the congregation of the Gods, that is not a congregation of Kings. So