A92846:640
The anatomy of secret sins, presumptuous sins, sins in dominion, & uprightness. Wherein divers…
The anatomy of secret sins, presumptuous sins, sins in dominion, & uprightness. Wherein divers weighty cases are resolved in relation to all those particulars: delivered in divers sermons preached at Mildreds in Bread-street London, on Psalm 19. 12, 13. Together with the remissibleness of all sin, and the irremissibleness of the sin against the Holy Ghost preached before an honourable auditory. By that reverend and faithful minister of the Gospel, Mr. Obadiah Sedgwick, B.D. Perfected by himself, and published by those whom he entrusted with his notes.The anatomy of secret sins, presumptuous sins, sins in dominion, & uprightness. Wherein divers weighty cases are resolved in relation to all those particulars: delivered in divers sermons preached at Mildreds in Bread-street London, on Psalm 19. 12, 13. Together with the remissibleness of all sin, and the irremissibleness of the sin against the Holy Ghost preached before an honourable auditory. By that reverend and faithfull minister of the Gospel, Mr. Obadiah Sedgwick, B.D. Perfected by himself, and published by those whom he intrusted with his notes.
London: printed by T.R. for Adoniram Byfeild, 1660
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Sol. Nevertheless there may be error in this, for though 1hardness of heart after sin be as ill a symptom of wickedness as impudency before sin, yet all trouble for sin committed, is not an infallible argument of in-dominion, which I clear.
Sol. Nevertheless there may be errour in this, for though 1hardnesse of heart after sin be as ill a symptome of wickednesse as impudency before sin, yet all trouble for sin committed, is not an infallible argument of in-dominion, which I cleare.
- 1As trouble for sin is not an argument of indominion. Proved.
1. By instance: if the worst of men may have after-troubles 1for former sinnings, then it is not an infallible argument, &c. (because, if sin hath dominion in any, then surely in the worst of men) but even they may have after-troubles.
1. By instance: if the worst of men may have after-troubles 1for former sinnings, then it is not an infallible argument, &c. (because, if sinne hath dominion in any, then surely in the worst of men) but even they may have after-troubles.
- 1By instance.