A93091:330
A treatise of liturgies, power of the keys, and of matter of the visible…A treatise of liturgies, power of the keyes, and of matter of the visible…
A treatise of liturgies, power of the keys, and of matter of the visible church. In answer to the reverend servant of Christ, Mr. John Ball. By Thomas Shepherd, sometimes fellow of Emanuel-College in Cambridge, and late pastor of Cambridge in New-England.A treatise of liturgies, power of the keyes, and of matter of the visible church. In answer to the reverend servant of Christ, Mr. John Ball. By Thomas Shephard, sometimes fellow of Emanuel-Colledge in Cambridge, and late pastour of Cambridge in New-England.
London: printed by E. Cotes for Andrew Crooke, 1652
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Object. If it be said that the sentence of an inferior Judge, proceeding rightly (as in an inferior Sanhedrin) is ratified in heaven, yet may we appeal from him.
Object. If it be said that the sentence of an inferior Judge, proceeding rightly (as in an inferior Sanhedrin) is ratified in heaven, yet may we appeale from him.
Answ. We deny that the sentence of every civill Court doth bind in heaven (in the sense of our Saviour:) for every civil Court hath not this promise of binding and loosing, the power of the Keys not belonging to the civill Magistrate.
Answ. We deny that the sentence of every civill Court doth binde in heaven (in the sense of our Saviour:) for every civil Court hath not this promise of binding and loosing, the power of the Keys not belonging to the civill Magistrate.
Secondly, suppose there were such a binding in civill Courts, and appeals may be yet made from them, yet this is because there is supposed a supreme Court in being, to which the appeal may be prosecuted and there determined, (as in the highest Sanhedrin of Israel.) But there is not in the Church, nor like to be, such a supreme Court where such appeals may be ended: Ergo.
Secondly, suppose there were such a binding in civill Courts, and appeals may be yet made from them, yet this is because there is supposed a supreme Court in being, to which the appeale may be prosecuted and there determined, (as in the highest Sanhedrin of Israel.) But there is not in the Church, nor like to be, such a supreme Court where such appeals may be ended: Ergo.