A93091:550
A treatise of liturgies, power of the keys, and of matter of the visible…A treatise of liturgies, power of the keyes, and of matter of the visible…
A treatise of liturgies, power of the keys, and of matter of the visible church. In answer to the reverend servant of Christ, Mr. John Ball. By Thomas Shepherd, sometimes fellow of Emanuel-College in Cambridge, and late pastor of Cambridge in New-England.A treatise of liturgies, power of the keyes, and of matter of the visible church. In answer to the reverend servant of Christ, Mr. John Ball. By Thomas Shephard, sometimes fellow of Emanuel-Colledge in Cambridge, and late pastour of Cambridge in New-England.
London: printed by E. Cotes for Andrew Crooke, 1652
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Reply. That visible believers baptized into a true Church, professing the true faith, and walking in holy obedience, and their seed should be judged such as are without in the Apostles sense, because they are not externally joined as set members to some peculiar Congregation in Church Covenant, is affirmed, not proved.
Reply. That visible beleevers baptized into a true Church, professing the true faith, and walking in holy obedience, and their seed should be judged such as are without in the Apostles sense, because they are not externally joyned as set members to some peculiar Congregation in Church Covenant, is affirmed, not proved.
Answ. Coming to the assumption of our argument it is expressed (according to the frequent manner in this Reply) in such terms as it is not affirmed by us, and therefore if it want proof, blame not us our assumption is; Such as are not in Church Covenant are not capable of Church censures: where by being in Church covenant we mean either implicitly or explicitly, membership in any true Church, as in our answer we express to prevent mistakes: and this is proved from 1 Cor. 5. 12. and in applying hereof we do not affirm that such are simply without in the Apostles sense, but in some respect only, viz. in regard of visible church Communion.
Answ. Comming to the assumption of our argument it is expressed (according to the frequent manner in this Reply) in such termes as it is not affirmed by us, and therefore if it want proof, blame not us our assumption is; Such as are not in Church Covenant are not capable of Church censures: where by being in Church covenant wee meane either implicitly or explicitly, membership in any true Church, as in our answer wee expresse to prevent mistakes: and this is proved from 1 Cor. 5. 12. and in applying hereof wee doe not affirme that such are simply without in the Apostles sense, but in some respect onely, viz. in regard of visible church Communion.