A95413:102
The doubting conscience resolved. In answer to a (pretended) perplexing question, &c. Wherein is…
The doubting conscience resolved. In answer to a (pretended) perplexing question, &c. Wherein is evidently proved, that the holy Scriptures (not the pope) is the foundation whereupon the Church is built. Or, That a Christian may be infallibly certain of his faith and religion by holy Scriptures. By William Twice D.D. Prolocutor of the Assembly of Divines. Written at the desire of Samuel Hartlib, Esquire, for the satisfaction of his friends beyond the seas; and now divulged in print for more public edification.The doubting conscience resolved. In answer to a (pretended) perplexing question, &c. Wherein is evidently proved, that the holy Scriptures (not the pope) is the foundation whereupon the Church is built. Or, That a Christian may be infallibly certain of his faith and religion by holy Scriptures. By William Tvvisse D.D. Prolocutor of the Assembly of Divines. Written at the desire of Samuel Hartlib, Esquire, for the satisfaction of his friends beyond the seas; and now divulged in print for more publick edification.
London: printed for Thomas Matthews, 1652
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
So that these were as little trained up in the Bible and other Books of Christian Religion as the Papists; ⟨p. 57⟩yea and far less. Any man hath freedom to try other Religions, have not we Christians freedom to try the Religion of the Jews and of the Turks? and God abandons some to turn Turks; and Papists have liberty to try our Protestant Religion, Vergerius did so, a Popish Bishop, with a purpose to refute it, but the hand of God was with him to open his eyes, as with Saul, and he turned Protestant. By these words, Calvinists and others urge the Bible more than we do, it appears this Author is no Calvinist; so by the words following, Do not the children of the Lutherans also inure themselves to their Religion from their childhood also? do argue that this Author is no Lutheran; so that what to make of him I know not, for he would not seem to be a Papist; it seems he is yet to choose his Religion: And yet if this course of his be serious, it is considerable, but he needs not go ⟨p. 58⟩far for an Answer to so superficiary a Discourse as this.
So that these were as little trained up in the Bible and other Books of Christian Religion as the Papists; ⟨p. 57⟩yea and far less. Any man hath freedom to try other Religions, have not we Christians freedom to try the Religion of the Jews and of the Turks? and God abandons some to turn Turks; and Papists have liberty to try our Protestant Religion, Vergerius did so, a Popish Bishop, with a purpose to refute it, but the hand of God was with him to open his eyes, as with Saul, and he turned Protestant. By these words, Calvinists and others urge the Bible more than we doe, it appears this Author is no Calvinist; so by the words following, Do not the children of the Lutherans also inure themselves to their Religion from their childhood also? do argue that this Author is no Lutheran; so that what to make of him I know not, for he would not seem to be a Papist; it seems he is yet to choose his Religion: And yet if this course of his be serious, it is considerable, but he needs not go ⟨p. 58⟩far for an Answer to so superficiary a Discourse as this.